Skip to content

Correct CO2 Management Data#273

Open
toniseibold wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
co2_management
Open

Correct CO2 Management Data#273
toniseibold wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
co2_management

Conversation

@toniseibold
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@toniseibold toniseibold commented May 6, 2026

Correcting:

  • outdated CO2 compression data (Mitsubishi data was for ship transport) with latest AIT study

Checklist

  • Code changes are sufficiently documented; i.e. new functions contain docstrings and further explanations may be given in doc. not applicable
  • Data source for new technologies is clearly stated.
  • Newly introduced dependencies are added to environment.yaml (if applicable). not applicable
  • A note for the release notes doc/release_notes.rst of the upcoming release is included.
  • I consent to the release of this PR's code under the GPLv3 license.

@toniseibold toniseibold marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2026 07:50
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 7, 2026 07:50
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the cost/energy assumptions for the CO2 liquefaction technology (used for CO2 conditioning/compression for transport) by replacing the previous Mitsubishi/IEA (2004, ship transport) reference with values from the 2024 AIT study, and propagates the update into generated output cost tables (global and US) plus release notes.

Changes:

  • Replace CO2 liquefaction CAPEX/FOM/electricity-input source data with AIT study values (and remove the previous heat-input row).
  • Update inputs/manual_input.csv so the compilation pipeline produces the new CO2 liquefaction outputs.
  • Add an “Upcoming Release” note documenting the CO2 dense-phase compression update.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
outputs/US/costs_2050.csv Updates US output rows for CO2 liquefaction to AIT-based assumptions.
outputs/US/costs_2045.csv Same AIT-based CO2 liquefaction update for 2045 US outputs.
outputs/US/costs_2040.csv Same AIT-based CO2 liquefaction update for 2040 US outputs.
outputs/US/costs_2035.csv Same AIT-based CO2 liquefaction update for 2035 US outputs.
outputs/US/costs_2030.csv Same AIT-based CO2 liquefaction update for 2030 US outputs.
outputs/US/costs_2025.csv Same AIT-based CO2 liquefaction update for 2025 US outputs.
outputs/US/costs_2020.csv Same AIT-based CO2 liquefaction update for 2020 US outputs.
outputs/costs_2050.csv Updates global output rows for CO2 liquefaction to AIT-based assumptions.
outputs/costs_2045.csv Same AIT-based CO2 liquefaction update for 2045 global outputs.
outputs/costs_2040.csv Same AIT-based CO2 liquefaction update for 2040 global outputs.
outputs/costs_2035.csv Same AIT-based CO2 liquefaction update for 2035 global outputs.
outputs/costs_2030.csv Same AIT-based CO2 liquefaction update for 2030 global outputs.
outputs/costs_2025.csv Same AIT-based CO2 liquefaction update for 2025 global outputs.
outputs/costs_2020.csv Same AIT-based CO2 liquefaction update for 2020 global outputs.
inputs/manual_input.csv Replaces the underlying manual input entries for CO2 liquefaction with AIT-based data.
docs/release_notes.rst Adds an Upcoming Release bullet about the CO2 dense-phase compression update.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread inputs/manual_input.csv Outdated
Comment thread inputs/manual_input.csv Outdated
Comment thread outputs/costs_2050.csv Outdated
Comment thread outputs/US/costs_2050.csv Outdated
Comment thread docs/release_notes.rst Outdated
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment thread inputs/manual_input.csv Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bobbyxng bobbyxng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally looks good to me, two comments

  • consider moving CO2 liquefaction,carbondioxide-input,0,1,t_CO2/t_CO2,-,, into config.default of the pypsa-eur workflow, as this does not add any new data to technology.data
  • Add to release_notes the rather big change in CO2 liquefaction capital cost (which make sense as the previous value was simply wrong)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bobbyxng bobbyxng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[Comment deleted, wrong PR, nvm]

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@fneum fneum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but what I don't understand is the origin of the big cost difference. Perhaps you can explain?

Is the application / process really different? And if yes, should this perhaps be two separate technology names? Could double-check how TRACE uses "CO2 liquefaction" and if current use would be correct there.

Comment thread inputs/manual_input.csv Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants